top of page

Building a Safer Future: The Review of Approved Documents

Writer's picture: Will GageWill Gage

Since Grenfell, the construction industry has faced a harsh reckoning, with regulatory frameworks and practices put under intense scrutiny. At the heart of this is the Approved Documents (ADs)—guidance designed to help industry professionals meet building regulations. Yet these documents, while vital, have been widely criticised as overly complex and hard to navigate.



The review of the Approved Documents was announced on 2 December 2024 during a House of Commons debate on the Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report by Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner. The Building Safety Regulator (BSR) confirmed that the review would commence in early 2025.


This is part of a wider reform programme aimed at modernising the building safety landscape. It’s a meaningful step towards improving clarity and usability, and forms part of a broader programme of change.


Why Do Approved Documents Matter?


Approved Documents provide practical guidance on meeting building regulations in critical areas such as fire safety, structural stability, and accessibility. In theory, they translate regulations into actionable steps. In practice, their complexity often leads to confusion and misinterpretation.


Dame Judith Hackitt’s 2018 Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety described the ADs as "complex, ambiguous, and not user-friendly." This lack of clarity has contributed to a fragmented approach to compliance, leaving room for error and, at times, negligence. For smaller operators in particular, grappling with these documents can feel like an uphill battle.


These challenges were further highlighted in the Grenfell Tower Inquiry’s Phase 2 report, which underscored the need for clear, regularly updated guidance. Together, these findings make a compelling case for reform.


What Changes Are Coming?


The BSR’s review of the ADs, a key part of its 2023–2026 Strategic Plan, aims to tackle these issues head-on. Here’s what’s on the table:


1. Clarity and Accessibility


The first step is to make the ADs easier to understand and apply. This involves simplifying technical jargon, improving structure, and resolving inconsistencies. Crucially, the guidance will also be tailored to meet the needs of smaller businesses, many of which lack in-house regulatory expertise.


2. Digitisation


In line with Hackitt’s recommendations, the ADs will move into the digital age, with an aspiration for interactive, searchable formats to replace static PDFs; making it easier to find relevant information and keep up with changes.


3. Regular Updates


A framework for ongoing updates will ensure the ADs stay relevant as building technologies and practices evolve. This is a stark contrast to the irregular updates of the past and could help reduce gaps in knowledge over time.


4. Industry Collaboration


The BSR is assembling a panel of experts from across the construction sector, including architects, engineers, and housebuilders. Residents’ voices will also be heard, reflecting the importance of involving those directly affected by building safety decisions.


Why This Matters


The implications of this review are worth considering. Here’s what it could mean for the property industry:


1. Improved Compliance


Simpler, clearer guidance should reduce the likelihood of accidental non-compliance. For building owners and operators, this could translate to fewer costly mistakes and a reduced risk of penalties or enforcement actions.


2. Safer Buildings


By removing ambiguity, the updated ADs could empower professionals to make better decisions, supporting the ongoing effort to improve safety standards. However, this will also require proactive industry engagement.


3. Efficiency Gains


Digitised and simplified ADs may streamline workflows, saving time and resources. Developers, for instance, could benefit from more straightforward guidance, enabling smoother project delivery.


4. Rebuilding Trust


In an era of heightened scrutiny, demonstrating compliance with robust, updated guidance provides an opportunity to improve public confidence in the sector. This trust will only grow through consistent delivery on safety commitments.


Key Industry Stats


The scale of the problem underscores the need for reform:


  • Fire Safety Failings: A report by the Institution of Fire Engineers found that 92% of fire safety professionals believe non-specialists lack adequate fire safety knowledge.

  • Economic Costs: Deloitte’s 2022 Global Construction Survey revealed that UK construction firms lose billions annually due to compliance-related penalties and delays.

  • Lagging Digital Adoption: McKinsey’s 2023 report on digital transformation in construction showed that less than 40% of UK firms use digital tools for compliance management.


The AD review represents an opportunity to engage with updated guidance, but building owners and operators will also need to adopt tools and practices that simplify compliance management.


Centralised, digital platforms for organising and accessing building information will become increasingly important as the regulatory landscape evolves.


Building the Future


This is where platforms like Building Passport come into play. Offering a secure, purpose-built system for managing building information, Building Passport helps owners and operators stay on top of compliance requirements. As the ADs evolve, tools like these can support practical implementation, helping to bridge the gap between guidance and action.


Conclusion


The Building Safety Regulator’s review of the Approved Documents is a constructive step towards modernising building safety guidance in the UK. While it’s not a panacea, it offers a clear pathway to addressing long-standing challenges. Its success will rely on how well the industry engages with these changes and incorporates them into practice.


This review forms part of a broader effort to improve building safety and compliance. With the right tools and commitment, the sector can continue its journey towards safer, better-managed buildings—one step at a time.

Comments


bottom of page